the Edge is Wayne Gretzky, your argument's invalid ([info]katrin) wrote,
2009-09-03 13:19:00

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    switch
     
    Help
  • 10 comments

[info]antigone_ks

September 3 2009, 01:31:52 UTC 2 years ago

They should totally scan my brain when I'm watching Zachary Quinto in anything. Or not. Maybe there are some things I should keep private.

[info]katrin

September 3 2009, 02:14:53 UTC 2 years ago

I don't know if it would work, I have never noticed any giant-like qualities to your head.

[info]antigone_ks

September 3 2009, 02:19:45 UTC 2 years ago

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic. I've been spending too much time explaining very simple concepts to students to take anything for granted :(

[info]katrin

September 3 2009, 02:24:47 UTC 2 years ago

I am taking their words to mean "a scanner for giant heads" for the lulz, rather than the (presumably) intended meaning of "a giant scanner for heads."

Your head is a normal size.


<33333

[info]elfwreck

September 3 2009, 06:03:14 UTC 2 years ago

This post has been included in a linkspam roundup

[info]etcetera_cat

September 3 2009, 12:28:50 UTC 2 years ago

Apparently, I have functional (and possibly structural) deficiencies by virtue of being asexual. And now I'm really having to hold myself back from jumping all over him, possibly in hobnailed boots.

Also, stringing together impossibly long paragraphs just to demonstrate how many polysyllabic words you know does not make you look smart, it makes you look like a douche. Someone should try (again) explaining this to 'Dr' Oogi. Preferably with a mallet.

[info]katrin

September 4 2009, 00:55:29 UTC 2 years ago

I WILL HOLD HIM DOWN FOR YOU.

Make him get out of my science, he's making my science look STUPID.

[info]etcetera_cat

September 4 2009, 13:22:23 UTC 2 years ago

Make him get out of all sciences ever D:

[info]laughingrat

September 3 2009, 14:39:27 UTC 2 years ago

Also, brain sciences. Because "neurology" is just too big a word for us gals to understand.

[info]katrin

September 4 2009, 00:57:57 UTC 2 years ago

I am still waiting for an explanation as to why a neurologist thought he could get any usable data from a survey on the internet. I mean, there's so much fail that it's hard to pull one piece specifically out, but even if the survey had been done well (you know, like, made sense and been ethical), how the hell did they pick their methodology?
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…